Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Pinks All Out = Thumbs Down

  1. #11
    Senior Member TRUUBLE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Scottsdale
    Posts
    201
    Quote Originally Posted by TorchedMach1 View Post
    We where definately suprised. I prolly woulda made it just running the motor. Instead I ran it on the bottle, and broke the rear-end. I even thought my mid-elevens where gonna be too slow, there where so many fast cars there.
    I would have hooked my 24 foot enclosed trailer to the car if I knew they were going to pick 12.50.
    Fastest N/A Mustang vert on the planet? (9.81@ 136.34 mph) If I had a TURBO I could go back in time


  2. #12
    Senior Member TorchedMach1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    422
    Gold Award 
    Quote Originally Posted by TRUUBLE View Post
    I would have hooked my 24 foot enclosed trailer to the car if I knew they were going to pick 12.50.


    u blew the rear end? damn that sucks
    Yeah something went BOOM. Not sure exactly what. We are thinking Diff, or Gears. I guess thats what happens when you leave at 6800 RPM on the bottle with slicks. I just can't beleive my rear-end went before the tranny. My 3650 was definately not built on a Monday or Friday.

    The car was trailered to the shop yesterday so the PSR guys should have it up and running with a fresh T-56 in no time. Also big thanks to everybody there who helped me out.
    Arizona's Fastest Mach 1
    11.14 @ 120 w/ 1.48 60'

    GO-FAST MODS
    Magnaflow O/R X-Pipe
    Magnaflow Catback
    Steeda CAI
    Torch Red JLt Intake Tube
    Steeda Tri-Ax
    Spec Stage 3 Clutch
    Built 31 Spline Rear w/ 4.10's
    Rear Upper and Lower Control Arms
    NX Wet Kit (100 Shot)
    SCT Chip
    Custom Tune by PSR

  3. #13
    Member Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Peoria, AZ
    Posts
    65
    I got a couple of calls from Rambo yesterday from the track. He said they went with the 12.5 time because so many guys were sandbagging into the 10 second range. They offered up $500 for some of the fastest times and all of the sudden your 10 second cars were going 8's. Don't know this as fact, just what someone who was there thought. On a good & bad note, Rambo went 11.17, at 124. He drove the car to Tucson, but thinks he might have damaged the motor some on the next pass. Peddled it a couple of times when it rattled, went 11.40 at only 110.

  4. #14
    Senior Member TRUUBLE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Scottsdale
    Posts
    201
    Quote Originally Posted by Craig View Post
    I got a couple of calls from Rambo yesterday from the track. He said they went with the 12.5 time because so many guys were sandbagging into the 10 second range. They offered up $500 for some of the fastest times and all of the sudden your 10 second cars were going 8's. Don't know this as fact, just what someone who was there thought. On a good & bad note, Rambo went 11.17, at 124. He drove the car to Tucson, but thinks he might have damaged the motor some on the next pass. Peddled it a couple of times when it rattled, went 11.40 at only 110.
    Yeah . . there was some sandbagging early on, so they re-ran the first 150 or so cars and most went quicker. But, even then, there was a very strong low tens contingent.
    Fastest N/A Mustang vert on the planet? (9.81@ 136.34 mph) If I had a TURBO I could go back in time


  5. #15
    Senior Member AZSonicSnake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    North Phoenix
    Posts
    4,184
    Gold Award 
    that makes sense. i can believe that happening. still sucks though. a small group has to ruin it for alot of people.

    Tuned By PSR TUNING
    11.07 @ 127.93
    My Autolog Profile

  6. #16
    Senior Member TRUUBLE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Scottsdale
    Posts
    201
    FWIW, I ran all out every run . . . just like I always do.
    Fastest N/A Mustang vert on the planet? (9.81@ 136.34 mph) If I had a TURBO I could go back in time


  7. #17
    Senior Member AZSonicSnake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    North Phoenix
    Posts
    4,184
    Gold Award 
    oh i have no doubt about that, as i know all the cars from PSR were putting it all on the line. that why i said the few sandbagging like that ruins it for alot of others.

    Tuned By PSR TUNING
    11.07 @ 127.93
    My Autolog Profile

  8. #18
    Super Moderator 4Jenna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    1,939
    Platinum Award 
    Bummer, sorry to hear
    JENNABEARS Foundation
    www.jennabearsfoundation.org

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Phoenix
    Posts
    948
    yea it was a waist of a new set of tires and a weekend but hey it was fun

  10. #20
    Senior Member 03cobrazzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    450
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan View Post
    yea it was a waist of a new set of tires and a weekend but hey it was fun
    He ill try again in March San Antonio Texas.what can i say 10.80 without cage ALL OUT.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •