Wild West Mustangs of Arizona

[hpmotzd]

I missed part of the conversation last night. Is anyone going to 91st and Northern tomorrow night?

[hpmotzd]

personally I dont think you can have the 60's models with the post '70 cars. Almost a totally separate animal. At the same time you dont want another class with only 2 cars, so if anything, I would add them to the later models rather than the earlier. Just my opinion.
I think we should see if we cant add ourselves to the movie night on feb 23rd, sounds like fun.

[Blown66]

91st is going to start up again in February (1st Friday)

I agree with your that he needs to be added up. He seemed pretty adamant so I didn't want to argue until I found out if others agreed with me. I'll wait to see what others say.

As for the movie night, I am on his email list (I am still gonna ask him if we can do one), so I'll keep us involved for sure.

[hpmotzd]

Sounds great. BTW, we are going to try and be there by or around 8 on Sunday morning, so just let us know what we can do to help.

[AZSonicSnake]

Okay opinions from some (you guys) that don't have a horse (pun intended) in this race. Should 1971-73 be judged in with the 60's and 1970, or should it go with the small number of cars we'll get to 1993?

Should it be 1971-1986, 87-2004 if we only have two classes? The biggest problem is we really could end up with 2 1971+ cars if we take it to 1986.

Opinions...

dunno if i would split the foxes up though, i would do like 71-93. and thena seperate class for 94-04. and i think the early 70's stangs should go with the 60's class. otherwise i think we'll get some un happy campers. just my .02 though. i like the idea of adjusting on the fly. as you sometimes never know what will actually show up.

[Blown66]

AZ "i would do like 71-93. and thena seperate class for 94-04."
AZ " i think the early 70's stangs should go with the 60's class. "

Ahhh...did you just say two different things? Or when you say early 70's you meant 1970 stangs only?

[AZSonicSnake]

yeah...guess i did not make it very understandable though did i..lol. sorry. thats exactly what i had in mind though.

[Blown66]

Here is something for you guys from another website...as you can see the member we are talking about is very passionate. He would rather go down in class and lose to some sixties cars than up and lose to a 93 lol. SO. . .with that said, I just found this from another show.

Is he right...should he come down? Or is the placement just an opinion and everyone has one?

First Generation - 1964 1/2 to 1973

Second Generation - 1974 to 1978

Third Generation - 1979 to 1993

Fourth Generation - 1994 to 2004

Fifth Generation - 2005 to 2008

[Blown66]

You know what he's right (via Wikipedia and drumroll...HPS lol). . .I'm going to push the change to be (depending on number of cars) to the classes of...combining 74-93.

First Generation - 1964 1/2 to 1973

Second/Third Generation - 1974 to 1993

Fourth Generation - 1994 to 2004

Fifth Generation - 2005 to 2008

[AZSonicSnake]

You know what he's right (via Wikipedia and drumroll...HPS lol). . .I'm going to push the change to be (depending on number of cars) to the classes of...combining 74-93.

First Generation - 1964 1/2 to 1973

Second/Third Generation - 1974 to 1993

Fourth Generation - 1994 to 2004

Fifth Generation - 2005 to 2008

i think this layout is perfect!!! no changes needed.


btw- i like the updates to the WWM homepage.