Again, the torque is low (although you don't notice it on the street) is because I have a Stock lower pulley. 4lb lower pulley is going on next year.
17.5 lbs at 622HP
20.0 lbs at 686HP on 110 Octane.
Again, the torque is low (although you don't notice it on the street) is because I have a Stock lower pulley. 4lb lower pulley is going on next year.
17.5 lbs at 622HP
20.0 lbs at 686HP on 110 Octane.
Not bad. Not sure what a 2.9 should put down but that's impressive if thats your actual daily driven horsepower. The place that tunes my car usually throws a few degrees more timing a leans out the fuel to get the higher Jo numbers on the dyno. The backs it back down for daily use. You know just to impress the Internet jockeys.
Actually I had them tune it for "safety" over a higher internet number. The car has more in it especially with some longtubes and 4lb lower pulley. I told them to be conservative. I spent a lot of money on parts and didn't want it blowing up. I do have a race tune on it, but that is loaded for when I go to the track.
oh theres no doubt that 600+ is alot for the street. i bet its a blast. what long tubes are you going to go with?
2004 SVT Cobra, C&L, Pypes, SLP, B&M, Steeda, conservative 483rwhp @ 12.6 psi
My tuner suggested they have great luck combining the 2.9 Whipple with some AMR 1 3/4 long tubes with their X-pipe. So, I am leaning that way.