Im looking at getting a supercharger here in the near future, wanting to know the major differences from the traditional superchargers and the centrifugal. Pros, Cons?
Thanks
-Mike
Im looking at getting a supercharger here in the near future, wanting to know the major differences from the traditional superchargers and the centrifugal. Pros, Cons?
Thanks
-Mike
you can call Dan at PSR he can give you all the info you need they do both styles of superchargers and can tell you the pros and cons 602-2698955 and they are in phoenix 2420 w.sherman street 85009phx az they also have a dyno.
I had a Procharger on my old GT. Loved it to death. Much easier to stay out of boost. They are slightly more efficient than a twin screw but the boost comes in differently. Centri's make more boost the higher you go in RPM where as Eaton's and other roots/twin screw generally make close to peak boost ~2k RPM.
2012 Race Red GT w/ a 5 Liter and a 6 speed
2010 Dodge Challenger R/T traded in.
'03 DBS Cobra .... Traded in, THANK GOD
'01 Ford Lightning.... Sold, sorely missed
as you can see it looks pretty similar to an na graph. It's rpm based where as the torque curve on my cobra would be pretty much flat from 2k to redline
I haven't driven a centi blown car but I have driven a few turbo'd cars and many different Roots-type blown cars. I hated waiting for boost on the turbo cars but I love the instant tire shredding torque you get from a Roots/Screw type.
2012 GT500 543/533 11.7@120
1995 5.0 minute or two per lap
you werent driving the right car if you were waiting for boost lol. even on my 6 i was full boost before 3000rpm
2005 v6 redfire mustang. yup its slow.
12.03 @ 118.5 best et
12.11 @ 122.0 best mph
ya i was only like 450+tq at 3k rpm, but lacking 2 cylinders lol.
if i had to go back and choose between turbo or s/c though, i woulda kept it stock
2005 v6 redfire mustang. yup its slow.
12.03 @ 118.5 best et
12.11 @ 122.0 best mph