View Full Version : Goooooo.......
princessturtle
02-01-09, 09:14 PM
Steelers!!!
:laughing1:won by way of ballerina. :pinkthumb:
BurnTire
02-01-09, 09:15 PM
6 rings in Pittsburgh. :twothumbsup:
Jacostang
02-01-09, 09:33 PM
Her we Go Steelers!!!!!!! Here we go!!!!!!
AZSonicSnake
02-01-09, 09:36 PM
certainly had to win that one. no gimme at all. great game played by both teams.
Jacostang
02-01-09, 09:45 PM
Big Ben triple pump to Santonio Holmes tip toe for the touchdown win!!! I still cannot believe that!!
AZSonicSnake
02-01-09, 09:51 PM
yup. awesome play. though i was excited to see fitzgerald run for the TD, i knew there was waaaaaaaay too much time left on the clock. bah, oh well. no one can say the cardinals rolled over and played dead.
Jacostang
02-01-09, 09:55 PM
Really one of the best games I have seen in a very long time!!
There needs to be more eyes on the field. The refs were definately not up to par or it was just too much for the number there was.
they called a fair game the cards just didnt want it
princessturtle
02-02-09, 09:03 AM
i agree with Dan. there are always extra calls or different calls that could be made to benefit both teams. to say there weren't enough eyes on the field is seems wrong imo. they have an obsessive amount of cameras. it was a fair game, but i think that the cardinals were under so much pressure and they kept making small mistakes. there were alot of times that they could of had it, but misstepped and lost it. the only reason they almost won near the end was because the steelers became increasingly aggressive.
Actually they missed a handfull of calls. Why wasnt Harrison ejected for throwing punches, or when Holmes did his salt shaker with the ball? The NFL doesnt have full time refs, and of all games why not put a few extra out there to help. Why have booth review if your not going to use it. Warner was in the forward progress of passing, that was an incomplete pass. Not saying that they would have won, but even Ray Charles could see that.
i agree with Dan. there are always extra calls or different calls that could be made to benefit both teams. to say there weren't enough eyes on the field is seems wrong imo. they have an obsessive amount of cameras. it was a fair game, but i think that the cardinals were under so much pressure and they kept making small mistakes. there were alot of times that they could of had it, but misstepped and lost it. the only reason they almost won near the end was because the steelers became increasingly aggressive.
Wrong. The Steelers were actually less agressive. They STOPPED blitzing Warner in the 2nd half.
Chuck, it was an incomplete pass. Arm going forward, ball came out forward. That is more of a pass than the retarded tuck rule.
AZSonicSnake
02-02-09, 11:54 AM
Actually they missed a handfull of calls. Why wasnt Harrison ejected for throwing punches, or when Holmes did his salt shaker with the ball? The NFL doesnt have full time refs, and of all games why not put a few extra out there to help. Why have booth review if your not going to use it. Warner was in the forward progress of passing, that was an incomplete pass. Not saying that they would have won, but even Ray Charles could see that.
apparently being a sore winner is ok in this day and age. still not sure how harrison stayed in the game, or how that whole celebration thing went down. pumped up or not, rules are rules.
princessturtle
02-02-09, 12:04 PM
Wrong. The Steelers were actually less agressive. They STOPPED blitzing Warner in the 2nd half.
Chuck, it was an incomplete pass. Arm going forward, ball came out forward. That is more of a pass than the retarded tuck rule.
eh, i tried. lol. i only partially watched the first half. :D
Jacostang
02-03-09, 02:54 PM
apparently being a sore winner is ok in this day and age. still not sure how harrison stayed in the game, or how that whole celebration thing went down. pumped up or not, rules are rules.
It was retaliation over the Cardinals creaming the Steelers holder on a field goal attempt.. Remember he ran him right over.
BurnTire
02-03-09, 03:02 PM
It was retaliation over the Cardinals creaming the Steelers holder on a filed goal attempt.. Remember he ran him right over. No the losers don't see both sides.:laughing:
I don't know how anybody with half a brain doesn't realize that you don't touch the holder. I didn't see it happen live but as soon as I saw the replays I knew the flag was more than justified. I have no problem with that penalty.
princessturtle
02-03-09, 04:11 PM
I don't know how anybody with half a brain doesn't realize that you don't touch the holder. I didn't see it happen live but as soon as I saw the replays I knew the flag was more than justified. I have no problem with that penalty.
If only i had a brain...... I haven't got a brain... only straw.
http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/7659.jpg
AZSonicSnake
02-03-09, 06:17 PM
It was retaliation over the Cardinals creaming the Steelers holder on a field goal attempt.. Remember he ran him right over.
is that how we justify using the ball as a prop for a celebration in the end zone too? retaliation or not, that jerkoff should have not been remaining in the game. i don't care who the f he is.
but what would i know, i am just an uneducated AZ sissy. :woot1:
BurnTire
02-03-09, 06:31 PM
Game Over. Pittsburgh Won. Thread closed.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.