PDA

View Full Version : SC'd and Turbo'd Cobra



wickedcobra
12-29-07, 12:28 PM
Check this out. Interesting indeed.

http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/9892/mmfp080128ztwinturbocomuy5.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://www.musclemustangfastfords.com/features/mmfp_0801_twin_turbo_compound_boost_2003_mustang_c obra/index.html

OH3MGSVT
12-29-07, 10:28 PM
He is obviously not scared

TruBluScreamer
12-30-07, 12:34 AM
would you be scared??

Ethan@S3M
12-30-07, 02:38 AM
Looks like Hellions new kit.

AZSonicSnake
12-30-07, 12:06 PM
compound power adders FTW!!!

OH3MGSVT
12-30-07, 04:44 PM
Are those nitrous lines I see too?!:icon_eek:

chewbaccajones
12-30-07, 08:13 PM
Are those nitrous lines I see too?!:icon_eek:

No, they ran a water/meth injection since they were getting about 44 lbs of manifold pressure.

OH3MGSVT
12-31-07, 12:03 AM
No, they ran a water/meth injection since they were getting about 44 lbs of manifold pressure.
Oh okay, because my god there could be soo much power there, likes theres not enough already! Imagine that thing with a 2.8 kenne at 22lbs, the twins at 22lbs and a good 150 shot :3gears:

6Jeff6
12-31-07, 09:57 AM
Yikes..

1000rwhp without fine tuning!!!!

Dang that would be sweet.


Jeff

Dan
12-31-07, 10:21 AM

svtstang34
01-02-08, 09:26 PM
Who do you think HP got the Idea From??

Dan
01-02-08, 10:14 PM

chewbaccajones
01-02-08, 10:37 PM
What issues did and do they have?

Dan
01-02-08, 11:25 PM
Tuning is and has ben a pain in the arse. they still are havingthe same issues with it I spoke to John a few months ago about this when he mentioned it to me. WOT is not hard it is the low and mid range that they are having issues with. Im sure lack of quality parts has a lot to do with it back then and maybe some to as well

svtstang34
01-07-08, 04:59 PM

Gene
01-07-08, 10:26 PM
is this a fact?

svtstang34
01-07-08, 10:29 PM
It's a fact!

5.0Stanger
01-09-08, 05:51 PM
Boy, oh boy. How the world turns.

Dan
01-09-08, 07:47 PM
hahaha now this is funny

wickd03
04-02-08, 04:03 AM
why do you need two adders?? Its worthless!! And very stupid for that matter. My car will run it down just being a single turbo... Oh well I guess opinions are like a**holes.. everyone has one.

tcchubb
04-02-08, 10:51 AM
why do you need two adders?? Its worthless!! And very stupid for that matter. My car will run it down just being a single turbo... Oh well I guess opinions are like a**holes.. everyone has one.

from what i have read on this set up. the supercharger gives you the low end power you want off the line and then when the turbos get going they cause the supercharger to somehow stop or open up or something to that effect. then the turbos give you the power up top. so its supposed to be like the perfect set up. i dont know if all of this is true i have just heard from other ppl.

Graham
04-02-08, 01:41 PM
Cool idea but seems like such overkill...

Ethan@S3M
04-02-08, 02:11 PM
why do you need two adders?? Its worthless!! And very stupid for that matter. My car will run it down just being a single turbo... Oh well I guess opinions are like a**holes.. everyone has one.


Saw the car last night Jason, looks good.

About2Bite
04-02-08, 04:09 PM
I've heard about this car, and what I understand is it's more of a "cool" thing than a practical or even necessary thing to do.

It is different that is for sure. Tuning it has to be fun.

Ethan@S3M
04-02-08, 04:27 PM
Why not do it Semi trucks have done this for years and it works.

WildBill
04-03-08, 12:23 AM
why do you need two adders?? Its worthless!! And very stupid for that matter. My car will run it down just being a single turbo... Oh well I guess opinions are like a**holes.. everyone has one.
You're pretty much on track man.:yes:

WildBill
04-03-08, 03:07 AM
Why not do it Semi trucks have done this for years and it works.

Two different fuels Ethan............plain and simple.

The system on this thread was tested on a dyno with a friggin' 23% correction factor!!!! :laughing::laughing:

Real simple question that will tell the tale on this system:
What system is far more efficient?
A twin turbo system that on a stock Cobra longblock produces 976RWHP/880RWWQ AT 26 psi.
A twin turbo compounded boost w/eaton on a stock Cobra longblock making 1,188 rwhp and 1,015 rwtq at 44psi?............with CLAIMED inlet temps of 120:laughing:

wickd03
04-03-08, 11:42 AM
Two different fuels Ethan............plain and simple.

The system on this thread was tested on a dyno with a friggin' 23% correction factor!!!! :laughing::laughing:

Real simple question that will tell the tale on this system:
What system is far more efficient?
A twin turbo system that on a stock Cobra longblock produces 976RWHP/880RWWQ AT 26 psi.
A twin turbo compounded boost w/eaton on a stock Cobra longblock making 1,188 rwhp and 1,015 rwtq at 44psi?............with CLAIMED inlet temps of 120:laughing:

plus you have twice as many things to go wrong. plus more money in the start up of the build. They make a trans brake to leave out of the whole. Or something called methanol, or a lil juice for that matter. And if you cant get your car too spool that well you have a badly built kit. I have no problems making my 82mm spool down low. Granted it doesn't start building boost @ 1000 rpms like a supercharger. But it does plenty for whats at hand. :twothumbsup:

wickd03
04-03-08, 11:46 AM
Saw the car last night Jason, looks good.
thxs homie